Austria January 2012
Our capacity for pursuing self-interest is the root cause for the destructive influence we are wielding on our planet
We talk about destroying the planet when in reality what we are doing is destroying our capacity to live on the planet. If we go then it, nature, will recuperate. We are the problem and our self-interest is the key issue.
Self-interest is everywhere and not just in competing businesses, with the monied classes or with politicians, all areas where we can expect to see it openly. Worse still it is in areas where one would expect moral leadership- in academia, in research, with NGOs and, paradoxically, within conservation groups. The AWF operates at a grassroots level, working with local communities with volunteers from around the world who understand that they gain as much from their experience as they give. But, everywhere we go we are confronted by appalling self-interest from outside organisations who really should know better.
In the Caribbean, our project teams identified an island, ideal to set up a volunteer programme- all the local players, community based NGOs and activity providers were enthusiastic but when we visited the island an Englishman who had married locally and through this relationship now sits on the environment committee of the country owning the island, whose approval we would need, intervened to say he would block us whatever we proposed as he deemed any action on the island unnecessary (he had tried to do the same things years earlier and failed!!!). !?
In West Africa, an Irish researcher was so incensed at our treading on his ‘territory’ that he complained to the Government! The local politicians laughed about the situation but that doesn’t change the facts of the nature of his actions. Our co-ordinator uploaded images of humpback whales to our Flickr account some of which, it transpired, belonged to the Irish man’s ‘team’. Rather than just drawing our attention to the situation, they tried to have our Flickr account closed down. When we suggested a collaboration, the possibility of our volunteers supporting their work, their response was aggressively dismissive.
We are to film in Borneo and Sierra Leone around the idea that communities can get kicked off their land in the name of conservation. These are uneducated peoples without voice who are not responsible for the environment disasters we have brought about and yet they are expected to pay the price without even being heard. Our project aims to give them a voice. Local conservationists- highly educated, articulate, very connected are dismissing our efforts as irresponsible as they will ‘encourage’ local communities to stand up and assert their rights.
In Tenerife we have to endure the continuous attacks from ‘researchers’ who are more interested in securing funding than actually doing any research. One was on TV a couple of years ago standing next to a female sperm whale that had been killed by, as everyone knew, Fred Olsen’s new high speed ferry (the researcher in question had friends who were divers employed to scrape the remains from the bottom of the ferries!!). He said on TV that the whale had been killed by a ‘big boat’ at which point the TV showed photos of the whale watching boats and gave voice to a local politician raging that they, the whale watching boats, needed ‘controlling’. If it wasn’t so farcical it would make one cry.
On the neighbouring island of La Gomera an encamped German team have been attacking Tenerife’s whale watching industry in what can only be described as a vitriolic manner for years whilst running their own very expensive whale watching operation. The hypocracy of the operation through which they make a good living in a foreign country from rich tourists and slam the local industry providing affordable opportunities to ordinary tourists is completely lost on them.
In Sierra Leone a particularly corrupt local NGO with whom we had offered to breathe life into their defunct community tree planting programme, funding village schools and education in the process, now openly complain about us because we baulked at the idea of handing them a £340,000 fee to facilitate their support.
A common theme is that highly educated and articulate research and conservation groups attack the idea of public access to nature but promote the idea that they should provide (very expensive) access to rich people so as to help fund their work!
These organisations are only interested in defending their turf and have no seeming interest in actually achieving anything except to preserve their jobs. They deliberately block and stop others and have absolutely no interest in collaboration.
Darwin talked of competition and natural selection but overlooked ideas of consensus behaviour, arguable the norm for the most successful species on our planet. Self-interest is undoubtedly normal in human behaviour. The difference between the present and the past is an almost total lack of moral framework. The Victorians, through competition and self-interest created the world’s greatest empire, but within the context of God, King and Country. These were common goals and values and because of them society produced great philanthropy ; today there is nothing but self-interest.
The challenge of saving our planet is to create common goals, the values that underpin the notion that all our efforts should be to help create a better world and to protect what we have; that we should measure our personal successes and achievements in terms of these collective goals. Be successful financially but within the context of helping the planet or at least not damaging it. If we get this right then people will work towards doing their bit, without any need for encouragement of coercion. This should be society’s drive- not to do it for people, not to demand that they do things. The latter approach will lead to expensive failure, writ the recent riots in British cities. Society has to give ownership to the people. Society has to work out how to make defending and protecting our fragile environment and nature the absolute goal of all citizens. If it does not do this all its actions will fail; if it does achieve this it need not do anything else!!
I am not optimistic as vested interest is around every corner and everywhere, and especially so in education, conservation, research, all areas where you would expect moral leadership. The AWF will do what it can, and it will not fail to do all that it can. It will touch the lives of many thousands of ordinary people, awakening them to their individual responsibilities. With help we could reach millions .. but, it needs cooperation and not competition.